PROCESS-AWARE FAIRNESS DIAGNOSIS

Fairness is more than the final decision.

SCOPED-Hiring follows how LLM agents score, scrutinize, deliberate, and decide—so a fairness risk can be located in the trajectory that produced an outcome.

Balanced outcomes can hide unequal treatment upstream. The audit records the decision path as well as its endpoint.

SAME OUTCOME · DIFFERENT PROCESS BURDEN
CV AMatched meritcontinuous history
CV BMatched meritcareer-gap field
PRIVATE ASSESSMENTTRAJECTORY LEDGERFINAL REVIEW
CV Astandard reviewHIRE
CV BPROCESS DIVERGES · + risk cue · clarify gap contextHIRE

Two tracks can visibly converge at the endpoint while retaining different preceding audit records.

PAPER EVIDENCE

One framework. Three forms of evidence.

SCOPED reads decision trajectories through six lenses, maps recurring risk across model backends, and tests whether a mechanism-aware intervention reduces the burden it diagnoses.

01

THE FRAMEWORK

Six lenses for one decision record.

The first two lenses examine outcomes and controlled counterfactuals. The remaining four inspect the process and design choices that shape a decision trajectory.

O

Procedural lens

Private scrutiny

Inspect risk cues and verification burden before a selection is made.
02

DIAGNOSTIC LANDSCAPE

A risk map, not a single score.

SCOPED diagnostic salience heatmap across six fairness lenses, three model backends, and controlled signal families.
How to read it. Read across a row to locate the decision layer; compare signal families to see which controlled cues activate risk; darker cells indicate stronger relative diagnostic salience.
CAREER GAP5.02×GPT process-aware salience
UNIVERSITY PROXY7.41×GPT process-aware salience
IDENTITY CUE2.65×GPT process-aware salience
03

FROM DIAGNOSIS TO REPAIR

Target the burden where it enters.

Fair Skills activates at the relevant decision point to constrain unsupported suspicion, proxy scoring, and unequal investigation.

Fair Skills intervention design and layered fairness-burden results.

INTERACTIVE TRAJECTORY THEATRE

Three observed risk patterns, read through the decision path.

Each scene translates a paper result into the audit locations where SCOPED reads it. The theatre explains the evidence above—it does not reproduce every component of the MAS architecture at once.

01 · CAREER GAP · UNCERTAINTY → SUSPICION

A matched employment history can attract more risk framing before selection.

The signal is recorded before selection, so a comparatively balanced outcome does not erase the earlier difference in burden.

01

CONTROLLED PAIR

Continuous history Career-gap variant

Target role, skills, and experience are held fixed.
02

RECORDED PROCESS SIGNAL

Gap-related private risk cue

94% vs 32%GPT private-assessment rate for career-gap versus no-gap candidates.
03

WHAT THE ENDPOINT MISSES

Comparatively balanced endpoint

Final hire-rate differences can remain small after earlier scrutiny has diverged.
04

REPAIR LOCATION

Constrain unsupported suspicion

Fair Skills targets unsupported risk framing and unnecessary clarification at the point it enters the decision.See Fair Skills evidence ↓
5.02× GPT process-aware / outcome-oriented salience

PORTABILITY + RESOURCES

The audit logic can be rebound to a second simulated domain.

Controlled variants, structured trajectories, six lenses, and direction-aware analysis remain in place across high-stakes multi-agent decisions. The domain interface is what changes.

In simulated credit underwriting, we rebind the outcome, applicant cues, score rubrics, and agent roles. This is a portability study of the audit design, not a deployment, legal, or universal-metric claim.

WHAT STAYSAudit procedurematched variants · structured traces · six lenses
WHAT CHANGESDomain interfaceoutcome · attributes · roles · rubrics

Hiring: hire / reject   →   Credit: approve / decline

RESOURCES

Follow the trajectory.

CITE US

Preprint coming soon.The complete BibTeX entry will appear here once the arXiv version is online.